UK Column
- Vista Test
- Nov 3, 2022
- 2 min read
The lie is that we, as a Nation, are bankrupt and therefore we must suffer massive public sector spending cuts to our military and public services in order to help balance the books. The lie is simple, but it is still a lie. Britain is not bankrupt. The International Banks are bankrupt and have hung their £6 trillion of debt around the neck of the British Nation. When a company or sole trader becomes insolvent, receivers are called in to manage the companies affairs, to try and salvage the company as a going concern, and in the worst case, to pay off those who are owed money by the insolvent company. Having placed a company in Receivership, the existing company Directors are hardly the best people to leave controlling the company. A priority will be to remove the company Directors from their posts, or to monitor them in their execution of the receivers instructions. Yet none of this has happened with the International Banks. Having passed through insolvency and into bankruptcy, the Banks have not only been allowed to continue to trade, their debts have been covered from the public purse. This would appear to be madness, but is in fact, much more serious. The failure of the banks is being used as the excuse to strip the UK of effective Armed Forces and a credible defence of the Nation State. We do not need defence cuts, we should simply throw away the worst banks, write off the debts - vast as they are - and leave the bankers to suffer their well deserved bankruptcy. The Government should then print and issue its own money (charging a modest and necessary interest) to fund the Nation’s defence. The same should be done for funding of all other necessary public services and infrastructure. Aside from removing excessive bank interest, better known as usary, from the backs of the population, the government will then be able to more easily and effectively manage inflation, by direct control over the issue of currency, and the growth of the money supply.

I found your coverage of the UK Column’s 8 August 2011 series particularly engaging; the insights into media coverage and critical commentary clearly sparked thoughtful analysis. Meanwhile, while navigating my own challenges with writing high-stakes papers, I explored university application essay editing, which led me to discover helpful exam helpers who eased the burden. It’s fascinating how thoughtful support, whether engaging with media or refining essays, can enrich understanding and build confidence.
You're referring to hair extensions or weaves sewn in beauty parlor. If you're discussing this in the context of the UK Column, perhaps it's about industry standards, health regulations, or trends in the UK beauty scene. Could you clarify the connection?
I stumbled upon the "Law Schools in the UK for International Students" service recently, and I must say it's a very useful tool for anyone looking to study law overseas. Being interested in studying law in the UK myself, I found the comprehensive data on leading universities, admission criteria, and visa procedures to be very useful. The UK Column's analysis of the legal education system and international reputation was a further clincher for me.